Opinion Paper

Early life and infant mental health: Reshaping assumptions in a southern field

Fiona Ross, Michelle Pentecost, Anusha Lachman
Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa | Vol 2, No 1 | a74 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jcmsa.v2i1.74 | © 2024 Fiona Ross, Michelle Pentecost, Anusha Lachman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 05 March 2024 | Published: 31 May 2024

About the author(s)

Fiona Ross, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Michelle Pentecost, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Faculty of Social Health and Policy, Kings College, London, United Kingdom
Anusha Lachman, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Mental health is a priority area for global health, with a particular focus on well-being in majority of the world countries. Attention to early life demonstrates the significance of infant well-being for long-term health. International organisations such as the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO), and the World Bank guidelines shape interventions in the majority world. At the same time, there are severe shortages of trained mental health personnel on the African continent and growing concerns about the potentially skewed evidence base that informs the science of interventions. Scholars across a range of disciplines are calling for attention to more diverse evidence sources; for better understandings of the syndemic interactions that shape mental health and for interventions that take account of local ideals while retaining a strong evidence base. As questions of how best to secure infant well-being and the adequacy of knowledge surrounding it emerges with growing force on the global scene, it is critical that the full range of infants’ worlds are represented in scholarship. What do exposures to structural violence, interpersonal violence, social assault, and environmental insult mean for our understanding of ‘normal’ development both in our context and globally? What are the dangers of not accounting for these exposures? What evidence bases matter? How do we know? These are critical questions. They arise in the context of limited, under-resourced and often poorly supported opportunities for adequate screening, early recognition, and suitable interventions for both infants and caregivers in Africa.

Keywords

early life; mental health; infants; global health; normal development; structural violence.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 313
Total article views: 187


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.